Same shell, different URL
Identical splash, loading indicator color, status bar color and navigation footer across several apps from one account.
App Store rejection
A 4.3 rejection does not mean your app is bad. It means a reviewer saw something they have seen before: the same app under another bundle ID, a template with a new logo, or five client apps from one account that differ only in color. Here is how Apple thinks about it and how to respond.
From $109 one-time per platform, or let our team do it all from $698.
Guideline 4.3 asks developers not to create multiple bundle IDs of the same app. If an app has versions for different locations, teams or customers, Apple prefers one app with the variation inside it, for example through in-app purchase or a selector. It also discourages piling onto saturated categories with look-alike apps. A related rule, 4.2.6, says apps created from a commercialized template or app-generation service are rejected unless they are submitted by the provider of the app's content, meaning the business whose app it is, from its own developer account.
Both rules exist because of app farms. Your situation is different, but a reviewer only sees the submission in front of them: a WebViewGold-based app with a splash screen, a bottom bar and a web layout that resembles the previous submission from the same account.
Identical splash, loading indicator color, status bar color and navigation footer across several apps from one account.
A free and a pro app, a per-city app, a staging app submitted to the store. Apple wants one app.
Ten restaurant or gym apps published from the agency's developer account instead of each client's account (4.2.6).
The same description template, screenshots with the same frames, one support URL and one privacy URL for all apps.
Variants of one product (plans, regions, teams) become one app with an in-app switch or in-app purchase. Genuinely different businesses stay separate apps, each with its own content, brand and account.
Own icon and splash (replace splash.gif and the icon set), own splashscreencolor, statusBarBackgroundColor, loadingIndicatorColor and bottombarBackgroundColor, own tabs in FooterBar.json, own native feature mix (push for one, QR check-in for another). Details in the app name, icon and splash docs.
A description about this business, screenshots of its content, its own support and privacy URLs on its own domain. No shared template sentences; see the metadata guide.
For client work, the client enrolls in the Apple Developer Program ($99 per year) and adds you to the App Store Connect team. The listing shows the client as the seller, which is what 4.2.6 asks for.
In Resolution Center, explain who the app is for, what content and features are unique, and that each app serves a different business. Attach side-by-side screenshots if the reviewer compared two of your apps.

My iOS WebView is finally approved. Thanks!!
| Scenario | Apple prefers | How to do it |
|---|---|---|
| Free and Pro versions | One app | One bundle ID, Pro as an in-app purchase through RevenueCat. |
| Same product per city, club or school | One app | Selector inside the web app; content loads by choice or by account. |
| Agency with several unrelated clients | Separate apps, separate accounts | Each client's developer account, each with distinct content and branding. |
| Staging and production | One app | TestFlight for staging builds; never a second App Store listing. |
WebViewGold is built for exactly this: one license per customized, published end product, with the internal project name staying "WebViewGold" while the Bundle ID, Product Name, icon and colors are the client's. Keep that discipline and 4.3 is rarely raised. If you prefer to hand the whole build to us, the Full Service is white-label too: the client receives the source projects and signed builds under their own name, and publishing happens from their developer account.
No. WebViewGold is a tool you configure and publish yourself, from your own account, around your own content. The rule targets services that submit look-alike apps on behalf of clients.
Apple expects the business that owns the content to be the publisher. For client work, use the client's account and get added as a team member; your agency account is for your own products.
Reply with the facts: two legal entities, two sets of content, two user bases, and screenshots showing different features. If each app really is distinct, reviewers usually accept the explanation.
Same result, different amount of work on your side. All three come with the approval guarantee and 24/7 human support.
$109 per platform, one-time
The WebViewGold license: a finished Xcode or Android Studio project. Paste your URL, set name and icon, switch on features, build and submit. Free updates forever.
See plans on the main page$349 per license, one-time add-on
No Mac, no Xcode, no Android Studio: configure in the browser, we build both apps in the cloud and hand them to App Store Connect and the Play Console.
How the Cloud Builder works Try the free demo$698 per platform $798
Send us your URL and icon. Our team configures, builds and delivers your app within 72 hours, white-label, with source projects. Both platforms for $1,158.
Full Service details Powered byWinter Sale prices valid until December 31, 2026.
App Store & Google Play approval guarantee – or your money back within 14 days
Rather hand it over? Full Service: we configure, build and deliver within 72 hours, from $698 per platform. Questions? Chat with us 24/7.
Refunds are granted under the conditions listed in our FAQ: a non-content rejection by Apple and/or Google, claimed within 14 days after purchase.